JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 11, 2018

A- de 2018

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio Piñeros Perdomo

✓Claimant Grety Patricila Lopez Alban Y Otro·Respondent Estatuto Tributario Art. 336 Y 388 Parciales

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Impedimento O Recusacion Por Interes Directo O Indirecto En Proceso
  • Contenido y alcance
Impedimento De Magistrado De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional, conformada en su totalidad por conjueces, decide ACEPTAR el impedimento manifestado por los nueve magistrados titulares de la Corporación, para intervenir y decidir sobre la demanda de inconstitucionalidad contra los artículos 336 y 338 (parciales) del Estatuto Tributario, en el marco del proceso correspondiente al Expediente D-12814.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la sala plena de la Corte Constitucional
  2. RESUELVE
  3. ACEPTAR el impedimento manifestado por los magistrados Carlos Bernal Pulido, Diana Fajardo Rivera, Luis Guillermo Guerrero Perez, Alejandro Linares Cantillo, Antonio Jose Lizarazo Ocampo, Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado, Cristina Pardo Schlesinger, Jose Fernando Reyes Cuartas y Alberto Rojas Rios para intervenir y decidir sobre la demanda de inconstitucionalidad contra los articulos 336 (parcial) y 338 (parcial) del Estatuto Tributario, en el marco del proceso correspondiente al Expediente D-12814.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Mauricio Piñeros Perdomo
Reporting justice
✓
Catalina Botero Marino
Presidente
✓
Juan Carlos Henao Pérez
Magistrado
✓
Luis Fernando López Roca
Magistrado
✓
Rodrigo Uprimny Yepes
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.